Comparisontheir pages read 22 Sep 2026
Onyx vs attest_tag
Onyx puts a company’s knowledge in front of its people and agents — a chat UI, a Slack bot, connectors synced continuously — so the difference is what its pages leave unsaid: attest_tag holds every write for a Confirm in the thread by default, prints model and cost under each reply, routes access grants to an approver who is never the asker, and ships as one MIT binary you can run yourself.
Which model answers
Any endpoint, per thread
What a turn costs, and who sees it
Model and cost under every reply
Where it runs
Hosted, or one binary of yours
Who holds the credentials
The proxy. Never the model
Who may approve
Never your own request
What you can audit
Every call, exportable
Pick attest_tag when
- A credential is given to the service, never to the model: an in-process proxy injects it one hop before the request leaves, the model only ever emits a URL and a method, and responses are scrubbed of secret-shaped values before they reach the model or Slack.
- Budgets that stop rather than report: a monthly budget for the workspace, another per channel, and a per-user hourly rate limit — the bot pauses at the ceiling and says so.
- The model is set per workspace, per channel and per thread with !model, and a heavy model is routed to automatically for code, threads past 25 messages or 20,000 characters, and turns that have made eight tool calls.
- “Fix this and raise a PR” hands the change to a separate worker container that clones the branch, runs the tests, makes the change, runs them again and opens a draft pull request; it pushes one branch and never merges.
- A flat monthly fee by plan size plus prepaid AI credit, never per seat — up to 10 users for $49, up to 250 for $599, each with AI credit included — with every feature in the free plan and the open-source binary, so what a paid plan adds is scale and paperwork.
Their page, ours
What the hero says, and what the rest of the site does not.
A hero line is a promise about the product. The questions an engineer asks before rolling one out are usually answered somewhere else on the site — or not answered. These are the ones we looked for.
Onyxtheir hero, verbatim
“Complete Context for Your Humans and Agents”
Onyx is an open-source platform that connects to your enterprise knowledge and gives humans and agents context, with a chat and search UI, custom agents and a Slack bot.
What their pages do not say
- A Confirm before an agent action runs
- Who may approve what, and whether anyone may approve their own request
- What a turn cost, printed under the reply
- How stored secrets are encrypted, and who can view them
On the public pages listed under the table, as of 22 Sep 2026. An absence is a fact about a page, not about the product; if one of these has since been answered, we will change it.
attest_tagthe same questions, in writing
Which model answers
Any endpoint, per thread
Models and costWhat a turn costs, and who sees it
Model and cost under every reply
Audit and budgetsWhere it runs
Hosted, or one binary of yours
Self-hostedWho holds the credentials
The proxy. Never the model
Credentials, in the guardrailsWho may approve
Never your own request
Access requests and tiersWhat you can audit
Every call, exportable
The audit trail
Side by side
Ten questions worth asking either way.
Our column is the same on every comparison, and each cell ends where the mechanism is shown. Theirs is Onyx’s own pages, quoted or closely paraphrased, as read 22 Sep 2026.
attest_tag
google/gemini-flash, with a heavy model routed to automatically for code and long threads, and a per-thread override.Onyx
attest_tag
!usage for the month by channel. A monthly budget for the workspace, another per channel, and a per-user hourly rate limit — the bot pauses at the ceiling rather than reporting having crossed it.Onyx
attest_tag
Onyx
attest_tag
Onyx
attest_tag
Onyx
attest_tag
Onyx
attest_tag
Onyx
attest_tag
Onyx
attest_tag
Onyx
attest_tag
Onyx
“Not stated on their site.” means we read the pages below on 22 Sep 2026 and did not find it — not that the product lacks it. Ask them; a vendor that answers all ten in writing is a good sign about the vendor. If we have something wrong, tell us and we will fix the page.
Pages read: Onyx homepagePricingSecure AI solutionsIntegrationsAgents & ActionsLLM GatewayOpen Source Statement (docs)Slack Bot setup (docs)
Questions
What people ask about Onyx and attest_tag.
Is attest_tag an open-source alternative to Onyx?
Can I run attest_tag on my own servers?
Which model does each run on?
What does a turn cost, and who sees it?
Does Onyx hold a write for a human before it runs?
Can someone approve their own request?
More comparisons
The same ten questions, asked of the others.
- vs ViktorAn AI coworker you @mention in Slack and Microsoft Teams, with its own computer in the cloud, connections to 3,200+ tools, and a pause for approval in the thread before sensitive actions.
- vs DustA platform for creating, sharing and running agents that connect your company knowledge, tools and teams, mentioned as @Dust in Slack or triggered from Slack workflows.
- vs LindyLindy is an AI teammate that connects to your tools, knows about your company and does work for the whole team, from Slack DMs and channels or as scheduled routines.
- vs RunbearRunbear puts AI teammates into Slack, Microsoft Teams and Discord channels, where they answer @mentions and direct messages and act through connected tools. It is priced by credits rather than seats.
- vs Slack AISlack’s built-in AI features and agents, sold with paid Slack plans and working inside Slack: “a powerfully simple way to be more productive, built with knowledge from your company.”
- vs ChatGPT for SlackOpenAI’s app for chatting one-on-one with ChatGPT in a dedicated Slack sidebar — summarising threads, drafting replies, searching Slack — with a companion ChatGPT Agents app for channels.
- vs DevinAn AI software engineer that ships pull requests the way your team does; you tag it in Slack or assign it a ticket in Linear.
- vs GleanAn enterprise AI platform that connects to a company's work apps and data sources to provide search, an assistant and agents across surfaces that include Slack and Microsoft Teams.
- vs GumloopAn AI agent platform where anyone at a company builds, shares and controls agents that connect to their apps and run on triggers, deployable to Slack channels and Microsoft Teams.
- vs MoveworksMoveworks is an AI Assistant platform for an entire workforce to search and act across business applications, reached through chat, web, intranets, service portals and mobile.
- vs Relevance AIA platform for building and running “specialist agents for every task”, which its site calls “The home of the AI Workforce”, with agents that answer an @mention in Slack.
- vs Zapier AgentsZapier Agents lets you create AI teammates, equipped with company knowledge, that do work across 9,000+ apps on command and on triggers, from a web app, Chrome extension or Slack.
- vs Claude TagAnthropic’s own Slack teammate: Claude, hosted for you, first-party inside Slack.
Try both
Run both in the same channel for a week.
We mean it. attest_tag answers in threads, so it will not collide with whatever else is in the channel, and a week of your own questions settles this faster than any table.
Half an hour to set up, one channel to start, and the free plan needs no card. See what it costs.