Solutions

Engineering

The decision, who made it, and a link to where.

#paymentspublic channel3 tool calls

What did we decide, and who said it first? Read from the week's threads, answered with a permalink on every bullet and the person and the minute on the attribution — then kept, with one sentence, for every future turn in the channel.

payments

Dan4:12 PM

@attest_tag what did we decide about retries this week, in three bullets? and who first suggested capping total retry time instead of the count?

attest_tagApp4:13 PM

  • read_channel_history · last 7 days · 54 messages
  • read_thread · “retries” · 2 threads
  • remember · this channel · 1 fact
  • Budget-based retries, not a fixed count: 2.5 s total per request with exponential backoff and jitter (10:07–10:08 Sat)
  • The earlier proposal — 2 retries up to 5 — is dropped; Priya flagged it as brownout risk (09:58 Sat)
  • Ships behind the payments client’s config flag first, on by default after a week (14:20 Mon)

Jack suggested the cap first — Saturday at 10:07, in this channel, as a counter-proposal: “What if we cap total retry time rather than retry count? 2.5s budget per request, however many attempts fit.” link

Saved for this channel: checkout timeouts are tracked in #payments-oncall, not here.

google/gemini-flash9.6k in410 out$0.0049Configure

Names, figures, repositories and customers are changed; token counts and cost are illustrative. The ask, and the shape of the answer, are as they were.

How the turn went

The channel as the record, a quote with a time, and one sentence kept.

  1. 01

    The channel is the record

    It reads the week and the threads the question points at. Slack is the source of truth on every turn, so an edited or deleted message is read as it is now, not as a stale copy.

  2. 02

    Attribution is a quote with a time

    Who said it first is answered with the message, the person and the minute — and a link, because a paraphrase of someone’s proposal is the kind of thing that starts arguments.

  3. 03

    Memory is one sentence

    “Remember for this channel: …” stores a fact that is added to every future system prompt there. Memories from a public channel are shared across the workspace; from a private channel or a DM they stay in that conversation.

What it needs

The setup, in the console.

Connection
None. Reading a channel or a thread the bot is in is a native tool, with no credential beyond the bot's own.
Scope
Any channel it is in. For a conversation that is not the current one and not public, it checks the asker's own membership first.
Memory
Per channel; !memory shows it, !forget deletes what matches, and the console lists all of it.

What it will not do

Enforced outside the model.

  • It reads with its own token, so before touching any conversation that is not the current one and not public, it checks the asker's own membership. It cannot be used as a periscope into a channel you were not invited to.

  • It reports what people said and when; it does not decide who was right.

Try it

Say it in a channel it is in.

The sentence as it was typed. It works in any channel the bot has been invited to that carries the connection above — no command syntax, no form, and follow-ups in the thread need no mention.

@attest_tag what did we decide about retries this week, in three bullets? and who first suggested capping total retry time instead of the count?

  • Slack
  • read_channel_history
  • read_thread
  • remember

Bring the channel this would live in.

Sign up, connect the service above in one channel, and type this sentence yourself — or run the same binary on your own infrastructure.

All solutions